U.S. Government Seek Facebook’s Aid to Investigate MS-13 Gang

The day when Facebook was born, angels looked into Facebook’s cozy little crib, gazed upon its cherubic face and declared “This one is going to be in trouble FOREVER!”. According to the messaging giant, U.S. government is allegedly “pressurizing” the company to break the Messenger’s encryption to aid in the investigation of the MS-13 gang.

2. MS-13 investigation: Facebook Under Pressure to Decode End-To-End Encryption of Messenger
Facebook Under Pressure to Decode End-To-End Encryption of Messenger

Allegations are made by the Facebook that U.S. government is trying to crack the encryption of Facebook’s Messenger app so that police can listen to a suspect’s voice messages in a criminal probe.

No filings are publicly available as the previously unreported case in a federal court in California will be proceeding under closure. However, three people told a leading media firm that Facebook is opposing the demand of the U.S. Department of Justice.

As per the per the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity further elaborated that the judge heard the arguments in the Messenger case on Tuesday, disdained Facebook for refusing to carry out the inspection request.

One of the people further articulated that, the Messenger issue stemmed in Fresno, California as a part of an investigation of the MS-13 gang.

The gang which is active in Central America and the U.S. is often used by Mr. Trump as a reason to condemn “sanctuary” laws stopping police from detaining people solely to enforce immigration law and to symbolize U.S.’s lax immigration policy.

When the Sheriff of Fresno County complained that California laws limited her co-operation with federal immigration enforcement targeting gang members, Trump called members of the gang “animals” this year.

However, the potential impact of the judgment still remains to be unclear. If the government predominates the Facebook Messenger case, it could put forth similar arguments to oblige companies to amend other prevalent messaging applications like Signal and Facebook’s WhatsApp, which includes both voices as well as text functions, say some legal experts.

Companies which consider themselves as guardians of individual privacy will face major implications while being under pressure from the lawmakers and police since the law enforcement agencies are forcing the technology providers to modify software to apprehend data that is no longer encrypted.

prosecutors are seeking a wiretap of ongoing voice conversations by one person on Facebook Messenger, Unlike the San Bernardino case, where the FBI wanted to crack one iPhone in its possession

two of the people briefed on the case informed that, Facebook is putting forth the statement that Messenger voice calls are encrypted end-to-end, indicating that only the two parties have access to the conversation.

Alphabet Inc’s (GOOGL.O) Gmail, Facebook text messages and other services are decrypted by the service providers, making them accessible for legal inception. However, end-to-end encrypted communiqués, contrastingly, go directly without revealing anything intelligible to providers, from one user to another user.

According to the sources, Facebook says, “We can only with the government’s request only in two conditions, either we rewrite the code relied upon by all users to remove encryption or by hacking the government’s current target.”

In spite of this, legal experts disagreed over whether the government would likely be able to compel Facebook to meet the terms.

A former judge, and federal prosecutor who represented San Bernardino victims, Stephen Larson stated, “The government must meet a high legal standard when seeking to obtain phone conversations, including showing there was no other way to obtain the evidence.”

He further added, “The U.S. Constitution still allows for reasonable searches and if those standards are met, then companies should not be able to stand in the way.”

Gidari, who is not involved in the Fresno case maintains, “A messaging platform is excluded.”


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here